When developing your SEO strategy, using branded terms like "Apple-compatible" might seem like a clever way to boost search rankings. However, trademark laws can make this approach risky if not done carefully. In this post, we’ll explore how trademark laws affect SEO, drawing on key legal cases like Employsure v ACCC, and show you how to minimise legal risks while protecting your rankings.
Can You Use Trade Marked Terms in SEO?
In Australia, for trademark infringement to occur, a trademark must cause consumer confusion or suggest an affiliation between your business and the trade marked brand. Using a brand name like "Apple" as an invisible keyword (in meta tags) usually doesn’t infringe, as consumers don’t see it.
However, if the trade mark is visible, such as in ads or search results, the legal risk increases significantly. Cases like Veda Advantage v Malouf Group Enterprises [2016] established that visible use of a competitor's trade mark can lead to infringement if it misleads consumers.
What Constitutes Trade Mark Infringement in SEO?
Trademark infringement occurs when:
- Consumers believe there’s a connection between your business and the trademark owner.
- The use of the trademark confuses consumers about who is offering the product or service.
If a trademark is used in hidden keywords, it doesn’t typically meet this standard. But visible use—such as in a meta description—can cross the line, especially if it implies endorsement or affiliation.
The Risks of Long-Tail Keywords Like "Apple-Compatible"
Using long-tail keywords like "Apple-compatible" may seem harmless, but it can still lead to legal consequences. There are three main risks to consider:
- Consumer Confusion: Even with a disclaimer like "not affiliated with Apple," consumers may still believe your product is endorsed by the brand.
- Trademark Dilution: Overusing a well-known trademark, even descriptively, can weaken its uniqueness, resulting in dilution claims.
- Australian Consumer Law (ACL): Misleading consumers into thinking there’s an association with the brand can breach ACL, as seen in Employsure v ACCC [2021]. In this case, Employsure misled consumers into thinking it was affiliated with government bodies by using "Fair Work" terms in visible Google ads, resulting in a finding of misleading and deceptive conduct.
Best Practices for Using Long-Tail Keywords
When using branded terms in SEO, follow these guidelines to avoid legal trouble:
- Be clear: Ensure that your messaging doesn’t imply endorsement or affiliation.
- Use disclaimers carefully: While they help, they don’t fully eliminate risk.
- Minimise brand name use: Overuse of a trademark may lead to trademark dilution.
How Meta Titles and Descriptions Increase Risk
Meta titles and descriptions are critical for SEO but come with a higher legal risk since they are visible to consumers. Using trademarked terms like "Apple-compatible" here increases the chance of consumer confusion or ACL violations.
Lessons from Employsure v ACCC
In Employsure v ACCC, Employsure’s use of government-related terms like "Fair Work" in its Google Ads misled consumers into thinking it was an official government service. Even though there was no direct trademark infringement, the Federal Court found it violated Australian Consumer Law by creating a false impression of affiliation.
Similarly, using a term like "Apple-compatible" in a meta description or ad could lead to a similar claim if it falsely implies a connection or endorsement.
Comparative Advertising in SEO: What’s Allowed?
You can use trademarked terms for comparative advertising, such as "Our devices are compatible with Apple products," under nominative fair use. However, this only applies when the use is necessary and doesn’t mislead consumers.
Dos and Don’ts for Comparative Advertising in SEO
- Do: Use the trademark only to explain how your product interacts with the branded product.
- Don’t: Imply endorsement or affiliation.
- Do: Ensure your comparison is clear, factual, and necessary.
Handling Cease-and-Desist Letters Regarding SEO Practices
If a brand like Apple sends a cease-and-desist letter about your SEO practices, follow these steps:
- Don’t Panic, But Don’t Ignore It: Respond promptly and professionally.
- Review the Claims: Understand the specific trademark use they’re objecting to.
- Adjust Your SEO: Remove or revise the trade marked terms in question and look for alternative keywords.
- Consult Legal Advice: Get legal support to ensure you’re compliant.
- Monitor SEO Impact: Track your performance and refine your strategy to avoid similar issues.
The Global Impact of Trademark Laws on SEO
When targeting international markets, it’s important to note that trade mark protection varies by country. Here’s how to avoid legal risks in global SEO:
- Different laws in different regions: A term like "Apple" may be protected in some countries and not others.
- Global reach, local laws: Even if the term isn’t protected where you operate, your SEO content may still be visible in protected regions.
- Use geo-targeting: Limit visibility of trade marked terms in regions where they’re protected to avoid infringement.
Using branded terms in SEO can boost your search rankings, but it also comes with legal risks. Whether you’re using trademarks in invisible keywords, meta descriptions, or comparative advertising, it’s important to stay compliant with trademark laws and avoid misleading conduct under the ACL. By following best practices and consulting legal advice when needed, you can protect both your rankings and your business.
Want More Guidance Like This?
For more insights on trademark laws, SEO strategies, and other legal considerations, join The Legally Legit Lounge! As a member, you’ll get access to a supportive community, over $5,000 worth of legal templates, monthly mentoring sessions, and expert advice on handling legal issues just like this. Get legally legit and take your business to the next level—sign up today!
P.S.: In Australia, "trade mark" is the correct spelling, but for SEO purposes, we’ve used "trademark" because it’s the more commonly searched term. Some may question this choice, but rest assured, we know the law. We’re simply using business-savvy strategies to ensure our content reaches more people while still delivering accurate legal guidance. It's all about being smart and strategic in both law and marketing!
